Legal Opinion

Terrell v. Terrell

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided August 13, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Equitable petition. Before Judge Beid. Clayton superior court. April 24, 1914.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

1. It is settled doctrine in this State that the owner of a mill-dam who maintains the same at a given height for a period of twenty years, which dam during that period causes water to back and overflow land of another, may obtain a prescriptive easement of flowage over the lands of the upper riparian owner. Columbus Power Co. v. City Mills Co., 114 Ga. 558 (40 S. E. 800); Monroe v. Estes, 139 Ga. 729 (78 S. E. 130); 40 Cyc. 676.

2. So far as the' question as to whether the maintenance of the dam in question in the case at bar might have been a continuing nuisance, on the ground that it caused…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Columbus Power Co. v. City Mills Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Monroe v. EstesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Goble v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Bentley v. AyersCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Brown v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1980
  4. Loughridge v. City of DaltonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1918
  5. Watkins v. Pepperton Cotton MillsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API