Legal Opinion

DANIEL JOHN MATTHEWS v. Michael Steinberg, Craig Latimer, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 22, 2014No. 1D14-3477PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClark, J.

There is one simple fact necessary in this appeal: Daniel John Matthews sought to be a write-in candidate for the Florida House of Representatives, but he did not reside within the district he wished to represent at the time he filed his qualifying paperwork with the Division of Elections. Mr. Matthews contends he is only required to reside in the district at the time of election — not filing. Because the Florida Constitution clearly delineates a residency requirement for legislators, which a statute cannot contravene, we agree.

The Florida Constitution mandates a legislator “shall be at least…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Askew v. ThomasSupreme Court of Florida · 1974
  2. Mairs v. PetersSupreme Court of Florida · 1951
  3. Norman v. AmblerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  4. State v. GrassiSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  5. Levey v. DijolsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. James Barry Wright v. City of Miami Gardens, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
  2. Jennifer Brinkmann v. Tyron Francois, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
  3. James Barry Wright v. City of Miami Gardens, etc.Supreme Court of Florida · 2016
  4. Rosario Rodríguez Y Otros v. Cruz Maldonado ——————–Rosario Rodríguez v. Rosselló NevaresSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API