Legal Opinion

Lumpkin v. Mankin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided September 10, 1926No. 12064PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Beease.

Action between the plaintiff, a colored man, who owned a mule, and the defendant, a colored woman, who owned a Eord automobile. The mule and the automobile mixed up in Arthur Town, on the Bluff Road, in Richland County. One of the important issues was which got hurt the worst, the Ford or the mule. Plaintiff, on account of the conduct of the automobile and driver, claimed $500, actual and punitive damages, “either or both.” The defendant denied plaintiff’s claim, and demanded by counterclaim $500 damages, actual and punitive, on…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. White v. BaileyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. State v. BallewSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  3. Sutton v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  4. Prescott v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1914

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Field v. GREGORYSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1956
  2. Harper v. . Harper and Wickham v. . HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. Padgett v. Colonial Wholesale Distributing Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  4. Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Fairchild v. South Carolina Department of TransportationSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2012

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API