State v. Gillam
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.
Before and during his trial, appellant Rodney Gillam, an indigent defendant, repeatedly requested substitute counsel, but the district court refused the request in the absence of an exceptional circumstance affecting the appointed attorney’s ability or competence. The court also excluded *443Gillam from the courtroom on several occasions because of his conduct, including the majority of his trial. Following guilty verdicts on three first-degree murder charges and two second-degree murder charges,1 the court sentenced Gillam to life in prison on Ms first-degree…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. George A. Webster, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- State v. FagerstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. BlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- State v. MuntSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. ChappleWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ChappleWashington Supreme Court · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.