Legal Opinion

State v. Gillam

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 12, 2001No. C0-00-407PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.

Before and during his trial, appellant Rodney Gillam, an indigent defendant, repeatedly requested substitute counsel, but the district court refused the request in the absence of an exceptional circumstance affecting the appointed attorney’s ability or competence. The court also excluded *443Gillam from the courtroom on several occasions because of his conduct, including the majority of his trial. Following guilty verdicts on three first-degree murder charges and two second-degree murder charges,1 the court sentenced Gillam to life in prison on Ms first-degree…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. George A. Webster, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  3. State v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. State v. VoorheesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  5. State v. FagerstromSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  2. State v. BlomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  3. State v. MuntSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
  4. State v. ChappleWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. ChappleWashington Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API