Legal Opinion

Timothy Barr v. Rebecca Pearson

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 27, 2018No. 17-3786PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MELLOY, Circuit Judge.

Missouri Department of Corrections inmate Timothy Barr filed suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that various state-contracted health care providers ("Defendants") violated the Eighth Amendment when they stopped administering his multiple sclerosis ("MS") medication. The district court 2 granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants, finding that their actions did not violate the Eighth Amendment. We affirm.

I. Background

The following information comes from a portion of Barr's medical record that was submitted to the district court. On May 21, 2014, neurologist Dr.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Schaub v. VonWaldCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  4. Dulany v. CarnahanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
  5. Gordon v. FrankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Jose Garza v. City of DonnaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. Carlos Hall, Sr. v. Eric HigginsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2023
  3. Travis Dantzler v. Tonia BaldwinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2025
  4. Abbagayle Marie Maget a/k/a Kevin Lee Maget v. Shawn Richard, et al.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2025
  5. Adam Hill v. Robert AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2026

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API