Legal Opinion
Harding v. Calogero
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 13, 2007PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Rolando T. Acosta, *364J.), entered May 10, 2006, which denied the tenants’ petition seeking to annul the determination of respondent agency (Division of Housing and Community Renewal [DHCR]) granting intervenor landlord’s application for a rent increase based on unique or peculiar circumstances, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The agency determination to increase petitioners’ maximum rents (see 9 NYCRR 2202.3 [a] [1]; 2202.7) had a rational basis (see Matter of Ansonia Residents Assn. v New York State Div. of Hous. & Community Renewal, 75 NY2d 206…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ansonia Residents Ass'n v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Alca Industries, Inc. v. DelaneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Parcel 242 Realty v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- DeJesus v. RobertsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Santo v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Executive Towers at Lido, LLC v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Rye Psychiatric Hospital Center, Inc. v. New York State Office of Mental HealthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009