Legal Opinion

Keller v. Hoyle, Morris & Kerr (In re Blinder, Robinson & Co.)

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided August 22, 1996No. Civil Action No. 94-K-2892; Bankruptcy No. 90-1170 SEE (SIPA); Adversary No. 94-1067 DECPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION ON APPEAL

KANE, Senior District Judge.

The Philadelphia-based law firm of Hoyle Morris & Kerr (HM & K) appeals from the bankruptcy court’s December 6, 1994 order entering judgment in favor of Glen E. Keller, Jr., trustee for the estate of Blinder, Robinson & Co. (“Trustee”), on his claims against HM & K for the turnover, pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 542 and 549, of $75,000 in legal fees transferred from the Lillian Blinder Trust to HM & K. HM & K contends the order should be reversed because: (1) the Trustee failed to prove the $75,000 was property of the estate; (2) the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re Branding Iron Motel, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  2. Keller v. Blinder (In Re Blinder, Robinson & Co.)District Court, D. Colorado · 1994
  3. Hoxworth v. BlinderDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1994

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sender v. Love Funeral Home (In Re Potter)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Colorado · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API