Legal Opinion

Edmison v. Sioux Falls Water Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1901PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Minnehaha county, Hon. Joseph W. Jones, Judge. Action by Percivel H. Edmison and another, against the Sioux Falls Water Company. From a judgment confirming a referee’s decision allowing damages on an injunction bond, the defendant and J. B. Clark and others, sureties, appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtHaney, J.

This action was commenced November i, 1892, by the plaintiff’s, Edmison and Jameson, who o.wned a building in Sioux Falls, occupied by numerous tenants, to restrain the defendant from discontinuing the supply of water furnished to such building from its water mains. A restraining order was made when the action was commenced, and continued in force until June 18, 1896, when a judgment was rendered wherein it was adjudged that the plaintiffs were not entitled to the restraining order, and the action was dismissed upon the merits. The undertaking given when the restraining order was issued,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hovey v. . the Rubber-Tip Pencil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Edmison v. Sioux Falls Water Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Quarnberg v. City of ChamberlainSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Kelly v. Narregang Investment Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1918

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API