Redd v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Indictment for possessing liquor; from Wilkes superior court — Judge Shurley. January 21, 1922.
1Opinion of the CourtLuke, J.
1. Exceptions to prejudicial remarks made by the court upon the trial of a criminal case, or like remarks made by the solicitor-general in his argument to the jury, cannot be considered by this court, unless a motion for a mistrial based thereon was made and denied. Stapleton v. State, 19 Ga. App. 36 (13) (90 S. E. 1029); Gilbert v. State, 25 Ga. App. 384 (2) (103 S. E. 694). Under this ruling, grounds .5 and 6 of the amendment to the motion for a new trial raise no question for determination by this court.
2. None of the remaining grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial shows…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stapleton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Lacount v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
- Gilbert v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1920
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Johnson v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
- Conoway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Ogletree v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
- Bishop v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.