Legal Opinion

State v. Schachter

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 23, 1990No. 89-454PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In this prosecution for theft and fraud, the appellant intervenor, Sugar River Savings Bank (Sugar River), appeals from decisions of the Superior Court (Dunn, J.) denying its motions to intervene and to recover as restitution bail forfeited by the defendant. We affirm.

In February of 1984, Sugar River instituted a civil action against the defendant, Matthew Schachter, apparently alleging that his fraudulent check-writing scheme had caused it to suffer $76,376.42 in damages. Later that year the defendant was indicted for having ob*440tained money by deception from four banks other than Sugar River,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Public Service Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
  2. Miller v. BasbasSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. TseliosSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  2. Warren v. Town of East KingstonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2000
  3. Riverwood Commercial Properties, Inc. v. ColeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
  4. State v. CetnarowskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1992
  5. State v. TarasuikSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API