Legal Opinion

Dobkin v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided December 18, 1950No. Docket No. 28013Published

Income -- Deductions -- Medical Expenses -- Section 23 (x). -- Expenses of an annual Florida trip, advised by a physician, several years after a coronary occlusion, were not medical expenses within section 23 (x) where a close connection between the expenses and the cure, alleviation, or prevention of some existing or imminent disease or physical defect is not shown.

1Opinion of the Court

Samuel Dobkin, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent

Dobkin v. Commissioner

Docket No. 28013

United States Tax Court

15 T.C. 886; 1950 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 17;

December 18, 1950, Promulgated

Decision will be entered for the respondent.

Income -- Deductions -- Medical Expenses -- Section 23 (x). -- Expenses of an annual Florida trip, advised by a physician, several years after a coronary occlusion, were not medical expenses within section 23 (x) where a close connection between the expenses and the cure, alleviation, or prevention of some existing or imminent disease or physical…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Havey v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  2. Stringham v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  3. Dobkin v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API