Legal Opinion

Baier v. Sprague & Henwood, Inc.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County

Decided July 21, 1937No. 483Published

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.,

This is a suit in trespass.

The summons was duly served upon defendant at its principal place of business in Lackawanna County. After-wards the plaintiffs’ statement was filed. Immediately upon the filing of plaintiffs’ statement, defendant obtained a rule to show cause why the action should not be dismissed and the service of the summons set aside.

*676The plaintiffs’ claim sets forth the ownership by plaintiffs, husband and wife, of certain land in the City of Wilkes-Barre, County of Luzerne, improved with a dwelling; that defendant by its agents and employes damaged said dwelling by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Livingston v. JeffersonU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Virginia · 1811
  2. McKenna v. FiskSupreme Court of the United States · 1843
  3. Williams Et Ux. v. MeredithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Brisbane v. . Pennsylvania R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
  5. Brown v. PersoneniSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API