Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Rice v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1997No. 26111Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partSpringer, J.

I concur with remanding this matter for resentencing, but I dissent to the remaining judgment of this court because there are two errors in this case that require reversal.

The most obvious error is the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the lesser degree of the crime of child neglect. Child neglect is a gross misdemeanor unless there is proof of “substantial bodily or mental harm.” Proof of the added element of substantial bodily or mental harm raises the crime of child neglect from a gross misdemeanor to a felony calling for a maximum of twenty years in prison.

NRS 175.2011…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lisby v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Village Development Co. v. FiliceNevada Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Nevada Cement Company v. LemlerNevada Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Paula Martineau & Georganna Lagen, AKA King v. Ron Angelone, Director of Prisons Frankie Sue Del Papa, Attorney General for the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
  5. Childers v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API