Legal Opinion
Hobart v. Schuler
New York Court of Appeals
Decided February 25, 1982PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and the certified question answered in the affirmative.
*1024Plaintiffs commenced this action to recover the balance due on a note given by defendant in connection with his purchase of plaintiffs’ shares in a corporation. Defendant’s answer asserted an affirmative defense and a counterclaim based on the alleged fraud of plaintiffs in inducing him to enter into the agreement. Plaintiffs moved to strike defendant’s answer and for summary judgment on the ground that there was no defense to their cause of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- Sabo v. DelmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by22 opinions
- Douglas E. Wall v. Csx Transportation, Inc. And Consolidated Rail Corporation, Docket No. 05-4065-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- In Re CINAR Corp. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Manufacturers Hanover Trust Co. v. Palmer Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Icebox-Scoops, Inc. v. Finanz St. Honoré, B.V.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Robert J. McRell Associates, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.