Legal Opinion · Dissent

Partlow v. Kolupa

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 31, 1986Published

1Dissent

Mahoney, P. J., and Levine, J.,

dissent and vote to reverse *511in a memorandum by Levine, J. Levine, J. (dissenting). We respectfully dissent. Although New York has adopted the transactional analysis approach of the Restatement (Second) of Judgments (see, Restatement [Second] of Judgments § 24 [1982]) to the doctrine of res judicata (O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357; Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 54 NY2d 185, 193; Matter of Reilly v Reid, 45 NY2d 24, 29-30), this broader application of the doctrine makes the caveat even more compelling that "[i]n properly seeking to deny a litigant two…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. O'Brien v. City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Reilly v. ReidNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Smith v. Russell Sage CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Mohrmann v. KobNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Ackerman v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API