Legal Opinion

Kerr v. State ex rel. Levy Court

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 15, 1815PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Baltimore County Court. Debt qb thn following bond: “Know all men by these presents, that we, William Kerr, William Jones, Charles Griffin, Richard Ridgely.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Baltimore County Court. Debt qb thn following bond: “Know all men by these presents, that we, William Kerr, William Jones, Charles Griffin, Richard Ridgely. Esquire, ami William Booth, all'of Baltimore county, in the state of Maryland, are held and firmly bound unto the slate of Maryland, in the sum of five thousand dollars current money of the United States, tobe paid to' the said stats; to the which payment, well and truly to be made and done, we bind ourselves, our and every of our heirs, executors and administrators, in the whole and for the whole, jointly and severally,…

1Opinion of the Court

The Court

reversed the judgment of the County Court ■on two grounds — 1. There was a special authority delegated which had not been strictly pursued by the levy court in making the appointment of a supervisor, on the day directed by the act of assembly. 2. There was no replication setting forth the breaches.

JUDGMENT REVERSED*

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Webster v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  2. Wells v. CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  3. Board of Commissioners of Public Schools v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API