State ex rel. K.C.C.

hi respectfully dissent, disagreeing "with the majority opinion insofar as it finds error in the trial court’s judgment overruling the exception of no right of action.

The majority reverses the trial judge for overruling appellant’s exception of no right of action. The inescapable threshold issue which the majority opinion acknowledges, but fails to adequately address, is in footnote 8 of the majority opinion:

8 T.T. did not rely upon La. Ch.C. art. 1004 in support of her exception of no right of action filed in the juvenile court on March 7, 2014. The longstanding rule of law is that appellate…