A.D. Store Co. v. Executive Director of DePartment of Revenue
Supreme Court of Colorado
1DissentChief Justice Mullarkey
The court today holds that the sales tax statute does not permit taxation on alteration services performed by a retail clothing store because the alterations are separable from the purchase of the garment. According to the court's holding, the alterations are separable from the purchase transaction regardless of when the alterations are performed on the garments.
In my opinion, alterations performed in connection with the sale of a garment and completed prior to a customer taking possession of the garment are part of the same purchase transaction and therefore, should be subject to the sales…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Colorado Department of Revenue v. Woodmen of the WorldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- Hewlett-Packard Co. v. State, Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Houghton Mifflin Co. v. State Tax CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
- Sharp v. Park 'N Fly of Texas, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
- Meyers Arnold, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.