Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Cremeens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 9, 2001PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mercure, J. P.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed June 15, 2000, which ruled *538that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

In our view, there is substantial evidence in the record to support the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board’s determination that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct. The record developed at a hearing before an Administrative Law Judge established that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of FrancisNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. In re the Claim of WrzesinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. In re the Claim of PluckhanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Matter of McCarthy (Grunblatt Psychology & Counseling Offs., P.C.--Commissioner of Labor)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. In re the Claim of GrahamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API