Legal Opinion

Town of St. Helena v. San Francisco, Napa & Calistoga Railway

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1914No. Civ. No. 1196PublishedCited by 3 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

The petition was for a writ of mandate to require respondent to lay the street pavement along its tracks in a public street of petitioner as demanded by an ordinance duly passed by said town. The trial court held the ordinance invalid as impairing the contract created by the franchise of the railroad, and therefore sustained a general demurrer to the petition. The appeal is from the judgment of dismissal following the order sustaining the demurrer. The provisions of the franchise which are directly involved in this consideration are as follows:

"1. That the said grantee, his heirs, or assigns,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska Ex Rel. OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Doyle v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. Western Paving & Supply Co. v. Citizens' Street RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Pacific Gas & Electronic Co. v. Police CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  3. Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. Southern California Edison Co.California Supreme Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API