Legal Opinion
Ex parte Yee Gee
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 7, 1927No. 19187PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ST. SURE, District Judge.
Yee Gee, a Chinese alien, was a lawfully domiciled laborer. He departed from the port of San Eraneiseo for China on September 30, 1924, bearing a regularly issued laborer’s return certificate (form 432), which entitled him to return within the period of one year from date of departure, unless an overtime certificate was granted by an American consular *654officer for an additional period not to exceed one year.
In March, 1926, the Chinese applied to the consulate general at Hongkong for an overtime certificate on the affidavits of himself and two others, setting forth that…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Low Wah Suey v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Kwock Jan Fat v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Tang Tun v. EdsellSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Zakonaite v. WolfSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Li Bing Sun v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Nagle v. QuenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1927
- Tomas Morales v. Ford Motor Company, et al.District Court, C.D. California · 2026