Legal Opinion

Reininger v. Pannell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 17, 1907PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from the District Court of Brewster County.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, Chiee Justice.

Plaintiff Reininger sued appellee, alleging that on October 20, 1905, he duly filed application to purchase section 124, block 22, G. H. & S. A. Ry. Co-, as an actual settler under the Acts of 1905, which was awarded to him, and that he made his settlement thereon. That thereafter on October 20, 1905, he filed his application in due form to purchase section 116, block G., M. K. & T. Ry. Co. as an additional section to his home section; paid into the State Treasury $16 at the time; that said .additional section was within a radius of five miles from his said home section…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BibbCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
  2. Spence, Administrator v. MitchellTexas Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Clark v. AltizerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  2. Davis v. YatesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Goodwin v. KoonceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  4. Payne v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  5. Crook v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API