Legal Opinion
G. T. Fogle & Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 20, 1943No. 5025PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DOBIE, Circuit Judge.
G. T. Fogle & Company (hereinafter called Fogle) instituted a civil action under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C.A. § 41(20), against the United States of America (hereinafter called the Government) in the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, seeking the recovery of damages for an alleged breach by the Government of three separate contracts entered into between Fogle and the Government for the rental of street and road construction equipment. The District Court rendered judgment for the Government and Fogle has duly taken an appeal to this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Merritt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Brawley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Sutton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Tempel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Hargis v. Maryland Casualty Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1946
- Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company v. Van Harris, an Individual, Doing Business as Harris & Sons, Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon Company v. Paramount Truck Rental, Inc., and Van Harris, an Individual Doing Business as Harris & Sons, Paramount Truck Rental, Inc. v. Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and L. E. Dixon CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
- Stark County v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
- Ross Engineering Co. v. PaceCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1946
- United States v. WillisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.