Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Rodgers

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 12, 1946No. 32019PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorn, J.

The question presented by this appeal is whether a, district court has jurisdiction to hear and determine .an action involving money belonging to a restricted Indian.

Plaintiffs, practicing attorneys, had successfully prosecuted certain litigation which culminated in Newman Har-jo being declared to be an heir at law of one Cully, deceased, a restricted Indian.

Plaintiffs brought this action alleging they had successfully prosecuted certain litigation in behalf of Newman Harjo, establishing him as an heir of •one Cully, deceased, a restricted Indian. Further, that the Department of Indian…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kansas, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garrett v. GordonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2013
  2. Prather v. Southern Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API