Legal Opinion

Spicer v. Shinseki

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 30, 2014No. 2013-7142PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Donald Spicer appeals from the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“Veterans Court”) affirming the decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (“Board”) finding that Stephen R. Spicer (“Spicer”) was not entitled to an increased rating under 38 C.F.R. § 4.71a, Diagnostic Code (“DC”) 5003. * See Spicer v. Shinseki, No. 12-2009, 2013 WL 2902798 (Vet.App. June 14, 2013). Because the Veterans Court did not err in interpreting the governing regulation, we affirm.

Background

Spicer served on active duty in the Navy from February 1984 to February…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brown v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Lockheed Corporation v. Sheila E. Widnall, Secretary of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  3. Oscar Johnson v. Edward J. Derwinski, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  4. Sursely v. PeakeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
  5. Nielson v. SHINSEKICourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kisor v. ShulkinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
  2. Kisor v. WilkieCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  3. Champagne v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2024
  4. Kisor v. McDonoughCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API