Beifeld v. Pease
Appellate Court of Illinois
Debt, on a replevin bond. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Edward F. Dunne, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the March term, 1901.
1Opinion of the Court
Hr. Justice Shepard
delivered the opinion of the court.
This is an action in debt on a replevin bond, given by appellants, in a suit wherein they were plaintiffs and Thomas H. Dorney and Edward Katzinger were defendants. In that suit there was no trial upon the merits, and the plaintiffs took a voluntary non-suit, and a return of the goods was awarded. Thereafter, this suit was begun on the replevin bond, James Pease, as sheriff of Cook county, bringing the suit for the use of the defendants in the original suit. v
It appears that the defendant Katzinger brought suit in attachment, in July,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- City of Chicago v. HesingIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
- Newkirk v. ConeIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- McConnel v. KibbeIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Curtis v. SageIllinois Supreme Court · 1864
- Peoria Marine & Fire Insurance v. FrostIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Huffer v. First National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926