Legal Opinion

Ball v. Thornton

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 15, 1935No. 30,129PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loring, Justice.

In a suit to recover the reasonable value of attorney’s fees rendered over a period of about 14 years the trial court found that there had been an accord and satisfaction by the acceptance by the plaintiff of a check for $2,000, and the case comes here upon the plaintiff’s appeal from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

It appears from the record that the plaintiff had been consulted many times by the defendant with regard to an expected inheritance of an interest in very valuable mining property owned by the defendant’s aunt and uncle. It would be useless to go into…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Beck Electric Construction Co. v. National Contracting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  2. State v. HumphreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Scholl v. TallmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Winter Wolff & Co. v. Co-Op Lead & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  3. Short v. J. R. Watkins Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1954
  4. Winter Wolff & Co. v. Co-Op Lead & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
  5. Winter Wolff & Co. v. Co-Op Lead & Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API