Winona & St. Peter Railroad v. Blake
Supreme Court of the United States
Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Waite
By its charter, the Winona and St. Peter Railroad Company was incorporated as a common carrier, with all the rights and subject to all the obligations that name implies. It was, therefore, bound to carry, when called upon for that purpose, and charge only a reasonable compensation for the carriage. These are incidents of the occupation in which it was authorized to engage. There is nothing in the charter limiting the power of the State to regulate the rates of charge. The provision in the act of Feb. 28, 1866, that the “ company shall be bound to carry freight and passengers upon reasonable…
2Cited by25 opinions
- The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Stone v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. North Carolina Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Simpson v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Budd v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.