Legal Opinion

Mayor and Council of New Castle v. Rollins Outdoor Advertising, Inc.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided February 10, 1983Published

1Opinion of the Court

BROWN, Chancellor.

This is an action brought to enforce a zoning regulation. Defendant has moved to dismiss. The issue presented calls into question the legality of a zoning ordinance which seeks to eliminate certain nonconforming uses through a gradual amortization of the value of the use. The question would appear to be one of first impression in this State.

The zoning ordinance involved was adopted by the plaintiff City of New Castle as a part of a 1968 reenactment of the zoning code of the City. It reads in relevant part as follows:

“6. Gradual Elimination of Certain Uses—

Certain…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Grant v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. MATTER OF HARBISON v. City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Suffolk Outdoor Advertising Co. v. HulseNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Hoffmann v. KinealySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API