Legal Opinion
Bryson & Hartgrove v. Boyce
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 24, 1906PublishedCited by 12 opinions
Appeal from the District Court of Concho County. Tried below before Hon. John W. Goodwin.
1Opinion of the Court
EIDSOM, Associate Justice.
The following statement of the nature and result of the suit contained in appellees’ brief, being substantially complete and accurate, is adopted:
“The land in controversy was patented to B. P. Boyce, husband of appellee Mary F. Boyce, December 29, 1875; who leased the same to appellant, the Concho Cattle Company of Texas, in 1887 for a period of five years. B. P. Boj^ce died in 1890, and in 1895 appellee Marv F. Boyce, by written instrument, leased the land to appellant the Concho Cattle Company for a period of five years, in consideration, among other things, that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harris v. SchlinkeTexas Supreme Court · 1901
- Flanagan v. PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
- Udell v. PeakTexas Supreme Court · 1888
- Hoyt v. JonesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
- Harle v. Langdon's HeirsTexas Supreme Court · 1883
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Early v. CorneliusTexas Supreme Court · 1931
- Wright v. JonesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Werts' Heirs v. VickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Boy v. McDowellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
- Burke-Simmons Co. v. KonzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.