Legal Opinion
Cherry v. Time Warner, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 18, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Catterson, J.
This action arises out of a claimed violation of Labor Law § 240 (1). The plaintiff alleges that he was not provided with an adequate safety device, a guardrail, while working on a scaffold at the Time Warner Center on Columbus Circle. The plaintiff further alleges that, as a result, he fell off the scaffold and was seriously injured.
•The undisputed facts are that on July 28, 2003, the plaintiff was an employee of subcontractor New England Construction Company (hereinafter referred to as NEC) which was contracted to work at the CNN studios, between the third…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Blake v. Neighborhood Housing Services of New York City, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Zimmer v. Chemung County Performing Arts, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Cahill v. TRIBOROUGHNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Koenig v. Patrick Construction Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Robinson v. East Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Krafcsik v. Egnatia Construction Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2021