Legal Opinion

Athey Truss Wheel Co. v. Moore & Moore, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided September 16, 1930No. 4241PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WOOLLEY, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff, assignor of two letters patent to Isaac H. Athey, charged the defendant with infringement of claims 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 21 and 22 of the first patent (No. 1,435,788) and claims 3, 8, 9, 10 and 11 of the second patent (No. 1,623,457) for inventions in traction vehicles and traction mechanism. The trial court having found the first patent not infringed and the second invalid dismissed the bill. 32 F.(2d) 781. This appeal followed.

First Patent.

The invention relates to a chain traction device differing from the familiar caterpillar type in that the power…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. I. T. S. Rubber Co. v. Essex Rubber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Weber Electric Co. v. E. H. Freeman Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Athey Truss Wheel Co. v. Moore & Moore, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1929

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kausal v. American Seating Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API