Stamatakis v. Kroger Co.
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
Plaintiff filed suit against defendants Kroger and the City of Grosse Pointe, seeking to recover damages for injuries she suffered in a slip-and-fall. The trial judge granted Kroger’s motion for summary judgment for failure to state a claim. From this order, plaintiff appeals by right. Grosse Pointe’s motion for summary judgment was denied. This Court granted Grosse Pointe leave to appeal. The two appeals were ordered consolidated.
On appeal, plaintiff has advanced two theories allegedly supporting her claim against Kroger. The first is the "increased hazard” doctrine approved by this Court in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Woodworth v. BrennerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1976
- Mendyk v. Michigan Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Creech v. Consumers Power Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ward v. Frank’s Nursery & Crafts, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Dettloff v. City of Royal OakMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
- Buffa v. DyckMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
- Collins v. City of FerndaleMichigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Davis v. MortonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.