Long v. Stilwell Homes, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHMER, Commissioner.
Plaintiff appeals from the action of the trial court in setting aside her $6,600 judgment against defendant. Defendant did not see fit to file a brief in this court or make an oral argument. A respondent need not of necessity file a brief. As stated in Fidelity Loan Securities Co. v. Moore, 280 Mo. 315, 217 S.W. 286-288, “The law casts the laboring oar upon appellant, and respondent intrusts his oar (whether laboring or otherwise) to this court.” However, it is the policy of all appellate courts to encourage briefs and oral argument by both parties. When a litigant does…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Albert J. Hoppe, Inc. v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1950
- Quinn v. St. Louis Public Service CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- De Maire v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Coonis v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Atterbury v. Temple Stephens Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kollmeyer Ex Rel. Kollmeyer v. WillisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1966
- Scheble v. Missouri Clean Water CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Vaughn v. RipleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
- Phillips v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- STATE EX REL. DINERS'FINANCIAL CORPORATION v. SwinkMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.