Legal Opinion

Wendell v. Conduit Machine Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1911PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from using plaintiff’s picture in defendant’s advertising catalogues.

1Opinion of the CourtMapper, J.

It is conceded that the defendant is using plaintiff’s portrait or picture for advertising purposes, or for the purposes of trade, without having first obtained his written consent, as required by the Civil Eights Law, section 50. That use consists of circulars or catalogues, showing the plaintiff in the act of operating a machine manufactured by the defendant.

By section 51 of the statute cited,' supra, a person whose portrait or picture is used within this state for advertising purposes, or for the purposes of trade, without his written consent, first obtained, as provided by section 50,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wyatt v. James McCreery & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sweenek v. Pathe News, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1936
  2. Almind v. Sea Beach Co.New York Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Lomax v. New Broadcasting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API