Legal Opinion
United States v. Carol Ann Hays, United States of America v. Mark Christopher Meng, United States of America v. Charles H. Meng, Jr., United States of America v. Marcel Jordan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 10, 1993No. 87-5164Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
17 F.3d 397
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Carol Ann HAYS, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Mark Christopher MENG, Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Charles H. MENG, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Marcel JORDAN,…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. David Dominic NecoecheaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Hector Francisco MolinaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Stanley Mills StanertCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.