Legal Opinion

Hawthorne Park District v. Seipp, Princell & Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 13, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,932PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Connor

Plaintiff, a municipal corporation, brought suit against defendant to recover $626.45, claiming that this amount was the compound interest it had paid defendant on overdue interest coupons. There was a trial. before the court without a jury, a finding and judgment in plaintiff’s favor for the amount of its claim, and defendant appeals.

The record discloses that plaintiff, a municipal corporation, issued its bonds to raise money for municipal improvements, in accordance with the statute. The interest on the, bonds was payable semiannually, evidenced by coupons. The coupons were not paid on the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Conway v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  2. South Park Commissioners v. DunlevyIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  3. City of Pekin v. ReynoldsIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
  4. People v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Vider v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1896

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Callaway v. AxtellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API