Legal Opinion

M. R. M. Realty Co. v. Title Guarantee & Trust Co.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 3, 1936PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.

The appellant entered into a contract to buy property on Tenth avenue in New York city. It applied to the respondent for an examination of title and . title insurance. Prior to the closing, respondent certified in writing that the title had been examined and approved by it and that the vendor could convey a good and marketable title thereto in fee, clear of all incumbrances and defects except “3. Restrictive Covenants, Easements and Agreements. Covenants and City Grants as to building wharf, road, &c. in L. ‘ G ’ p. 491 and L. 328, op. 91.” Annexed to the report was a typewritten sheet…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cambridge Valley Bank v. . DelanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Kingsland v. . FullerNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Brooks v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. McPherson v. GoldsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  3. 440 East 17th Street Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
  4. Miller v. Transamerica Title InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API