Legal Opinion

Le Page v. Slade

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1891No. 6646PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal irom Presidio. Tried below before Hon. T. A. Falvey.

1Opinion of the Court

COLLARD, Judge.

This is an action of trial of the right of property. John Slade, the appellee, holding and owning a note of some $3000 against E. R. Thurber & Co., brought suit on the same and levied attachment on 109 sacks of wool as the property of the firm. Henry Le Page, the appellant, claimed the property by affidavit and bond. The trial of the case resulted in a verdict and judgment for Slade, the attaching creditor, from which Le Page and his bondsmen appealed.

The first error assigned is that the court refused to instruct the jury as requested by the defendant that the burden of proof…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ellis v. A. S. Valentine & SonTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Tillman v. HellerTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Humphries v. FreemanTexas Supreme Court · 1858
  4. Weisiger v. ChisholmTexas Supreme Court · 1866

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. English v. PlumleeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  2. Slade v. Le PageCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  3. Haley v. Sabine Valley Timber & Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  4. Lloyd v. ChristianCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Skidmore v. First Nat. Bank of DetroitCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API