Aztec Management & Investment Co. v. McKenzie
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SEERDEN, Justice.
Whorton Johnson appeals from a judgment against himself, individually, and Aztec Management & Investment Co., Inc. (Aztec) which awarded money damages and attorney’s fees for breach of a contractual duty to furnish water to residential lots. Aztec is not a party to this appeal.
In his first point of error, appellant ar-' gues that there was no evidence to support the trial court’s finding that he, individually, as well as Aztec, had a duty to provide and install water mains at no cost to appel-lees.
In considering a “no evidence” point of error, we will follow the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
- Pace Corporation v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
- Allied Finance Co. v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Commercial Escrow Co. v. Rockport Rebel, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Wynne v. Adcock Pipe and Supply, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
- Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. La Villa Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- Dominguez v. Payne, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
- Mancorp, Inc. v. Culpepper, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.