Legal Opinion

Aztec Management & Investment Co. v. McKenzie

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided January 30, 1986No. 13-85-307-CVPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEERDEN, Justice.

Whorton Johnson appeals from a judgment against himself, individually, and Aztec Management & Investment Co., Inc. (Aztec) which awarded money damages and attorney’s fees for breach of a contractual duty to furnish water to residential lots. Aztec is not a party to this appeal.

In his first point of error, appellant ar-' gues that there was no evidence to support the trial court’s finding that he, individually, as well as Aztec, had a duty to provide and install water mains at no cost to appel-lees.

In considering a “no evidence” point of error, we will follow the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Glover v. Texas General Indemnity Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Pace Corporation v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Allied Finance Co. v. GarzaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Commonwealth v. DavisTexas Supreme Court · 1942

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commercial Escrow Co. v. Rockport Rebel, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  2. Wynne v. Adcock Pipe and Supply, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1988
  3. Commercial Union Insurance Co. v. La Villa Independent School District, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  4. Dominguez v. Payne, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  5. Mancorp, Inc. v. Culpepper, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API