Oliver v. State

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

— Appellant was convicted of pursuing the occupation and engaging in the business of selling whisky in local option county.

The evidence is very brief and practically without conflict to the effect that on or about the 9th of February, 1912, a witness named Wright bought of appellant 25 cents worth of whisky under the following circumstances: He says: “I met the defendant coming across the railroad in his delivery hack, which was his occupation, that is, to drive the delivery hack. He told the defendant he wanted to borrow half a pint of whisky. The defendant told him…