Commonwealth v. Galloway
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1ConcurrenceWieand, Judge
I agree with the majority’s determination that there was no trial error requiring the grant of a new trial. I concur also that the record does not support that part of the sentence which orders the appellant, James Patrick Galloway, to make restitution for the arson which he committed. However, I am unable to agree that an order of restitution must be based on a present, as opposed to a potential, financial ability to satisfy a sentence of restitution or that an order directing restitution to a subrogated insurance carrier is invalid. Therefore, I do not join in the majority opinion but…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FuquaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- United States v. FolletteDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth v. WoodSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. ErbSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Commonwealth v. KerrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.