Legal Opinion

Guinn v. Light

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 10, 1989No. 27A04-8709-CV-265PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

CONOVER, Presiding Justice.

Appellees Light and Funderburk have filed a petition for rehearing, claiming this court erred in its original opinion in several particulars. One issue they raise perhaps needs more exposition, namely, whether the Medical Review Panel provided by the Medical Malpractice Act has authority to determine whether a particular health care provider is “qualified” under the Act. Ap-pellees insist it does not because that Act provides

The. panel shall have the sole duty to express its expert opinion as to whether or not the evidence supports…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. MacAuley v. Waterman Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Anderson Lumber & Supply Co. v. FletcherIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Guinn v. LightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Guinn v. LightIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Inc. v. RayIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. Guinn v. LightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Kristyn R Plummer v. Indiana Patient's Compensation FundIndiana Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API