Legal Opinion

McCarthy v. SEPTA

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided April 14, 2000No. 2855Published

1Opinion of the Court

FIELD, J.,

— Plaintiff, Jonann McCarthy, appeals from this court’s order of January 28, 2000, denying her post-trial motion. For the reasons which follow, the post-trial motion was properly denied, and the judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, should be affirmed.

This suit arises out of injuries sustained by plaintiff on June 19, 1996, while she was working as a foreman for SEPTA. She and her work crew were to unload railroad ties at the work site. Normally such a task would be performed with more workers and different equipment than was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stewart v. MottsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. American Dredging Co. v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Wilson v. AndersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Papalia v. Montour Auto Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  5. Chemical Natural Resources, Inc. v. Republic of VenezuelaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API