Legal Opinion

Middlebrooks v. City of Birmingham

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided October 6, 1964No. 6 Div. 18PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CATES, Judge.

This is an appeal from a conviction, after verdict, for violation of § 1142 of the Code of the City of Birmingham 1944, as amended, whereunder Middlebrooks was convicted on a charge of standing or loitering so as to obstruct a street or sidewalk.

On his appeal from the recorder’s court to the circuit court, the appellant had a choice which he exercised in favor of demanding a jury trial. Ex parte Hall, 255 Ala. 98, 50 So.2d 264; Code 1940, T. 37, § 464; T. 13, §§ 429, 326. “* * * a jury trial may there be had on demand of the defendant * * § 326, supra.

The city, in its brief, has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. CarcelNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Phifer v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Ex Parte HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
  4. Tinsley v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
  5. Smith v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. State v. EckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
  3. In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  4. White v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
  5. Alfred Wright, .V the City of Montgomery, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API