Middlebrooks v. City of Birmingham
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
CATES, Judge.
This is an appeal from a conviction, after verdict, for violation of § 1142 of the Code of the City of Birmingham 1944, as amended, whereunder Middlebrooks was convicted on a charge of standing or loitering so as to obstruct a street or sidewalk.
On his appeal from the recorder’s court to the circuit court, the appellant had a choice which he exercised in favor of demanding a jury trial. Ex parte Hall, 255 Ala. 98, 50 So.2d 264; Code 1940, T. 37, § 464; T. 13, §§ 429, 326. “* * * a jury trial may there be had on demand of the defendant * * § 326, supra.
The city, in its brief, has…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. CarcelNew York Court of Appeals · 1957
- Phifer v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1963
- Ex Parte HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- Tinsley v. City of RichmondSupreme Court of Virginia · 1961
- Smith v. City of BirminghamAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Shuttlesworth v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. EckerSupreme Court of Florida · 1975
- In Re CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1976
- Alfred Wright, .V the City of Montgomery, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.