Legal Opinion

Bondy & Schloss v. Strategic Development Partners LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 24, 2011Published

1Opinion of the Court

The court erred in granting plaintiffs partial summary judgment based solely on its finding that a notation on a document created by defendants but consisting of information supplied entirely by plaintiffs constituted an admission by defendants. It is clear from the face of the document that defendants did not “manifest[ ] an adoption or belief ’ in the truth of its contents and, as such, the notation cannot constitute an admission (Addo v Melnick, 61 AD3d 453, 454 [2009]).

In any event, even if an admission, it was an extra-judicial admission, which is not conclusive and its probative value…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gangi v. . FradusNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
  2. Addo v. MelnickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. In re RhodesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API