Barnes v. Waterman
New York Supreme Court
Action for the purpose of declaring null and void two annuity agreements, which, were made and entered into .between defendant and one Robert T. Hicks, now deceased.
1Opinion of the CourtMorschauser, J.
This action was commenced for the purpose of declaring null and void two annuity agreements, dated April - 8, 1904, and October 6, 1904, respectively, which were made and entered into between the defendant and one Robert T. Hicks, now deceased.
The plaintiffs are the residuary legatees under the will of said Robert T. Hicks, deceased. Anthony D. Schroeder *393and the defendant, Waterman, were the executors of said will. Mr. Schroeder, as such executor, was originally joined as one of the plaintiffs herein, but he died after the suit was commenced and, by an amendment made upon the trial, his name…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cowee v. . CornellNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Ten Eyck v. . WhitbeckNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Green v. . RoworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Dolan v. CummingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
- Rosevear v. SullivanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rishel v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1935
- Morton v. Amos-Lee Securities, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
- Barnes v. WatermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- Barnes v. WatermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
- McGrew v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1936