Legal Opinion

Dubreuil v. Pinnick

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 20, 1978No. 1-578A124PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobertson, J.

Defendants-appellants Linda Dubreuil (Dubreuil) and Regina Wilson (Wilson) appeal a jury award in favor of plaintiff-appellee Trevor Pinnick (Pinnick). We affirm.

Pinnick brought this action for malicious prosecution and false imprisonment. Defendants contend that the verdict was not supported by sufficient evidence and was contrary to law.

In determining whether a judgment is supported by sufficient evidence, this Court neither weighs the evidence nor resolves questions of credibility of witnesses. Rather, this Court views only the evidence most favorable to the appellee, together with all…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. HendersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Kavanagh v. ButoracIndiana Court of Appeals · 1966
  3. Rieth-Riley Construction Company, Inc. v. McCarrellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Harness v. SteeleIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  5. American Express Co. v. PattersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Cummings v. HPG International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  2. Plan-Tec, Inc. v. WigginsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Anderson v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. American Optical Co. v. WeidenhamerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Howard Dodge & Sons, Inc. v. FinnIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API