Legal Opinion

In Re Bogollagama

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 20, 2009No. Bar Registration 418491; 09-BG-401PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

On further consideration of the certified copy of the Circuit Court of Virginia’s order revoking respondent’s license to practice law, this court’s May 18, 2009, order directing respondent to show cause why identical discipline should not be imposed, his responses thereto, and the Statement of Bar Counsel regarding reciprocal discipline, and it appearing that respondent has not filed the affidavit required by D.C. Bar R. XI, § 14(g), it is

ORDERED that Chandra Mahinda Bo-gollagama is hereby disbarred. Respondent has failed to establish the existence of any exceptions under D.C.Bar. R. XI,…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Matter of AddamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. In Re LaibstainDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. In Re FuchsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. In re MeadeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. In Re Keh Soo ParkDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. In Re TroxellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. In re AbalosDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. In re GuignonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API