Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Follette

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided October 26, 1938No. 14756PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

The demurrer in this case should have been sustained as to the defendants-appellants, C. C. Follette and Henry Monroe. The acts complained of and alleged to have been committed by these appellants, as agents of C. R. Follette, were separate, and there is no allegation of a conspiracy, or allegations from which a conspiracy could be inferred.

The “Jumbling Act” (Section 484 of the Code), gives relief from the requirement of a separate statement of two or more causes of action belonging to one of the classes which may be united under…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pendleton v. Columbia Ry., G. E. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
  2. Fennell v. WoodwardSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1927

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hopkins v. ShumanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API